-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
Update E-Board eligibility and term requirements to align with Campus Life requirements #274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update E-Board eligibility and term requirements to align with Campus Life requirements #274
Conversation
shaeespring
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We may be wrong about where these go. Candidates might be in bad academic standing, but they should be able to run as long as they aren't in bad academic standing at the time that they're selected
constitution.tex
Outdated
| \asubsubsection{Qualifications for All Executive Board Members} | ||
| \begin{enumerate} | ||
| \item Candidates must be Active Members during the term of office. | ||
| \item Candidates must be in good academic standing with both RIT and their academic department and may not be on a conduct sanction of disciplinary probation or higher during the term of office. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| \item Candidates must be in good academic standing with both RIT and their academic department and may not be on a conduct sanction of disciplinary probation or higher during the term of office. | |
| \item Candidates must be enrolled students at RIT, must be in good academic standing with both RIT and their academic department, and may not be on a conduct sanction of disciplinary probation or higher during the term of office. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But actually, now I have questions.
Must candidates meet these requirements? Or is it instead that they must meet these requirements upon selection
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have "during the term of office", should it be "during the term of office that they are running for?" (alternatively "for which they are running")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But actually, now I have questions.
Must candidates meet these requirements? Or is it instead that they must meet these requirements upon selection
Candidates don't have to meet the requirements while running, but by the time they actually assume office they should meet the requirements. I agree that it might be better somewhere else, maybe in 5.A.4 (selections) or 5.A.7.B (term). I don't know why I didn't realize that sooner oops
Co-authored-by: Shaela Spring <[email protected]>
Check one:
Summary of change(s):
Adds clauses to 5.A.3.A, 5.A.3.B, and 5.A.7.B requiring good academic and conduct standing.